The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, Thursday, threw out the petition by the Hope Democratic Party (HDP), Thursday, challenging the reelection of President Muhammadu Buhari in the February 23 election.
The party and its presidential candidate, Chief Ambrose Owuru had sought the nullification of President Buhari’s election on the grounds that the conduct of the election on February 23 by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was illegal, null and void on account of its shift in date.
INEC had shifted the election from February 16 to 23 March, 2019, on account of inadequate preparation.
In the course of argument of the petition, Owuru asked the five man panel to declare him winner of the presidential poll having been elected president by 50 million Nigerians through a referendum conducted on February 16, 2019.
They specifically prayed the tribunal to order their inauguration as president within 48 hours of hearing their petition based on the referendum of February 16.
In its judgment yesterday, the tribunal held that the petition which was based on a purported referendum held on February 16, 2019 was outside the jurisdiction of the tribunal, whose duty is to determine whether a person was validly elected into office of the president of Nigeria or not.
Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba, who delivered the lead judgment, which other members consented, said the petition which on the other hand challenged the postponement of the presidential election was at best a pre-election matter and ought to be presented at a Federal or State High Court and not the tribunal.
Justice Garba further held that the suit was liable to be dismissed on grounds that being a pre-election matter it was also filed outside the 14 days provided by the law.
The tribunal further held that the petitioners failed to prove the allegations that they were excluded from the election.
The tribunal held that from available exhibits the 1st petitioner’s name was number 69 on INEC’s final list and that the logo of the party with fish and boat was conspicuously pasted on the ballot papers used for the February 23 presidential election.
The tribunal therefore held that the claim of unlawful exclusion was of no issue and at best unwarranted.
In dismissing the petition, the tribunal held that there was no provision in the Constitution, Electoral Act and associated laws for the election of the president through a referendum and that the claim of referendum election was strange and alien to the mode of electing president.
Besides, Justice Garba agreed that the body that conducted the purported referendum is not known to law and that the purported emergence of Chief Owuru as president through voice vote at the referendum of over 50 million was not established, adding that the petitioners claim was spurious since it was only Owuru who participated in the referendum.
“This tribunal is not persuaded to invoke its powers to grant any of the reliefs sought by the petitioners because it has no jurisdiction to do so and on the fact that the petition is predicated on a purported February 16 referendum and not the election of February 23 that has the force of power.
“What is more, the only witness called by the petitioners, Yusuf Ibrahim, admitted in his evidence that the February 16 referendum was not conducted by INEC and that the February 23 presidential election was conducted by INEC and that he voted thereby making the claims and reliefs of the petitioners sought from the tribunal to be flying in the air and not grant-able”.
The tribunal further held that the claim of the petitioners that INEC has no power to postpone election is absurd because of the relevant laws that empower the electoral body to shift election and appoint a date for the election and that the petitioners only demonstrated lack of knowledge of the electoral law.
In conclusion, Justice Garba said that the petition is vexatious, lacking in merit, liable for dismissal and consequently dismissed having failed in all fronts.