Breaking NewsPoliticsRecent News

Suit Seeking to Remove Kebbi Gov: You’ve Not Been Able to Prove Allegations, Court Tells Challengers


Kebbi State Governor, Atiku Bagudu, got a reprieve on Friday as suit seeking his removal from office fell flat.
A Federal High Court in Abuja, told the plaintiffs that they failed to prove the criminal allegations preferred against the Governor, hence their case cannot succeed.
Justice Ahmed Mohammed consequently dismissed the suit on grounds of inability to establish the allegations against the Governor.
Bagudu’s main opponents in the April 11, 2015 governorship election in Kebbi State, Maj. Gen. Bello Sarkin-Yaki (rtd.), Anthony Itanyi and Sahabi Sami, had, in the suit, numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/312/2015, asked the court to declare Bagudu incompetent to contest the governorship poll in the state.
Those joined as defendants in the suit were his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
But the court in the ruling held that all the documents (exhibits) placed before it by the plaintiffs failed to show that Governor Bagudu was sentenced or fined for any offence by any court or tribunal.
“There are several Supreme Court judgments to the effect that no probative value should be attached to documents that are not tendered in court by the maker of such documents”, the court held.
According to Mohammed, the plaintiffs could not prove before the court that the information the first defendant (Bugudu) provided in form CF.001 to INEC was false, adding that: “From the evidence of the plaintiffs, I am of the opinion that he has failed, through his witness that the first defendant was convicted by a court in the United States of America for criminal offence.
Justice Mohammed said, the first defendant was arrested in May, 2003 for extradition, which he pointed out does not amount to a sentence of any kind and added that, nothing was before the court to suggest that the first defendant was convicted for any offence.
The Judge said the burden is on the plaintiffs to prove beyond reasonable doubt, the criminal allegations levelled against the Governor.
“On the whole, I see no merit in the suit of the plaintiffs, and it is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost”, the Judge held.
The plaintiff had, in their suit challenged the eligibility of Bagudu as the governorship candidate of the APC in the 2015 state governorship election in Kebbi state.
His suit, among other reliefs sought the removal of Bagudu as the Governor of Kebii state.
The plaintiffs asked the court to disqualify Bagudu as a candidate in the election and remove him from office on the grounds that the Governor gave false information in the Affidavit of Personal Particulars otherwise called Form CF.001 submitted by him to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The plaintiffs contended that the claim by Bagudu in Form CF.001 to the effect that he was not under a fine for offence, “involving in dishonesty or fraud or any offence imposed by a court or tribunal, is false”.
They claimed that contrary to Bagudu’s claim, it had been discovered that he was allegedly fined by a court in the United States of America (USA).

Alleged $300,000 Bribe: Court Dismisses Charges Against Former NAF Officer, Mamu

Previous article

Court Orders EFCC to Unfreeze Account Linked to Nyako’s Son, Abdulaziz

Next article

You may also like


Leave a Reply